User talk:Mike.lifeguard
From Git SCM Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(ask for rethinking of blind application of MW (actually, probably more like WikiMedia) rules) |
(fixes & re) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[metawikipedia:User talk:Mike.lifeguard]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Moving pages== | ||
If nobody else adds these funny links in their User talk pages, I do not think it would be a good idea for you to do it. | If nobody else adds these funny links in their User talk pages, I do not think it would be a good idea for you to do it. | ||
Likewise, I do not think that the majority of your contributions should look like moving a <u>lot</u> of pages to names that appeal better to you, not without asking others whether they like your mass-renaming. Here is a vote against such a mass renaming! | Likewise, I do not think that the majority of your contributions should look like moving a <u>lot</u> of pages to names that appeal better to you, not without asking others whether they like your mass-renaming. Here is a vote against such a mass renaming! | ||
| + | -- [[User:Dscho]] 21:34, 16 February 2010 | ||
| + | :The link is functional; I've restored it. | ||
| + | :Since when is one page considered "a lot?" <tt>O__o</tt> Maybe you should chill out [[User:Mike.lifeguard|Mike.lifeguard]] 22:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:10, 16 February 2010
metawikipedia:User talk:Mike.lifeguard
[edit] Moving pages
If nobody else adds these funny links in their User talk pages, I do not think it would be a good idea for you to do it.
Likewise, I do not think that the majority of your contributions should look like moving a lot of pages to names that appeal better to you, not without asking others whether they like your mass-renaming. Here is a vote against such a mass renaming! -- User:Dscho 21:34, 16 February 2010
- The link is functional; I've restored it.
- Since when is one page considered "a lot?" O__o Maybe you should chill out Mike.lifeguard 22:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
